点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
Background
This study aims to perform a systematic literature review (SLR) concerning the safety of synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the 2025 update of European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
本研究旨在进行系统文献综述(SLR),关注合成和生物疾病修饰性抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的安全性,以用于2025年欧洲风湿病学会(EULAR)类风湿性关节炎(RA)管理建议的更新。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
Methods
Medline , Embase , Cochrane CENTRAL , and Web of Science were searched for observational and randomised controlled trial s with a primary endpoint of DMARD safety on the conventional synthetic (cs-), biological (b-), and targeted synthetic-DMARDs , as well as glucocorticoids , published between January 14, 2022, and January 22, 2025.
在2022年1月14日至2025年1月22日期间发表的观察性和随机对照试验中,针对常规合成(cs-)、生物(b-)和靶向合成DMARDs以及糖皮质激素的DMARD安全性主要终点进行了检索,检索数据库包括Medline、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL和Web of Science。
Separate searches on DMARD monitoring were conducted from database inception to January 22, 2025.
从数据库建立之初至2025年1月22日,对DMARD监测进行了单独的检索。
A comparator group was required for inclusion .
需要一个对照组才能纳入研究。
All safety outcomes were included .
所有安全性结果均被纳入。
Results
A total of 3837 articles were identified , with 321 selected for full-text review ; 71 articles were included .
共识别出3837篇文章,其中321篇被选为全文审查;最终纳入了71篇文章。
Across the evidence base , infections were the most frequently assessed outcome : 13 studies examined serious or hospitalised infections , usually as composite endpoints of bacterial , opportunistic , and herpes zoster infection , while 1 addressed nonserious infections .
在现有证据中,感染是最频繁评估的结果:13项研究检查了严重或住院感染,通常是细菌、机会性和带状疱疹感染的综合终点,而1项研究关注了非严重感染。
Serious infections were more common with bDMARDs than csDMARDs .
与csDMARDs相比,bDMARDs的严重感染更为常见。
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) showed a higher herpes zoster risk than bDMARDs .
Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)相较于生物制剂疾病修饰性抗风湿药物(bDMARDs),显示出更高的带状疱疹风险。
Tuberculosis risk was not increased with JAKis compared with bDMARDs , but was higher with infliximab and adalimumab compared with etanercept .
与bDMARDs相比,使用Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)并未增加结核病风险,但与依那西普相比,使用英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗时结核病风险更高。
Fifteen studies evaluated malignancy , split evenly between analyses of any malignancy and those excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC); 2 focused on melanoma and 2 on NMSC .
十五项研究评估了恶性肿瘤,其中一半分析了任何类型的恶性肿瘤,另一半排除了非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC);两项研究专注于黑色素瘤,两项专注于NMSC。
Increased NMSC was noted in patients with RA using DMARDs compared with the general population , with no link to a specific DMARD .
与普通人群相比,使用DMARDs的RA患者中观察到非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)的增加,但与特定的DMARDs无关联。
Cardiovascular and thromboembolic events were reported in 20 studies .
20项研究中报告了心血管和血栓栓塞事件。
No consistent evidence of increased major adverse cardiovascular events risk with JAKis compared with bDMARDs was identified .
与bDMARDs相比,未发现JAKi增加主要不良心血管事件风险的一致证据。
Venous thromboembolism risk appeared elevated with JAKis compared with bDMARDs , driven mainly by pulmonary embolism .
与生物制剂疾病调节性抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)相比,JAK抑制剂(JAKis)的静脉血栓栓塞风险似乎有所提高,这主要由肺栓塞驱动。
Fourteen studies reported retention and adverse event -related withdrawals , and 8 assessed other specific adverse event s .
有十四项研究报告了保留率和与不良事件相关的撤回情况,另外八项评估了其他特定的不良事件。
Gastrointestinal perforation and demyelinating disease were each reported in 3 studies .
胃肠道穿孔和脱髓鞘疾病在3项研究中各有报道。
No eligible articles were identified in searches on DMARD monitoring .
在关于DMARD监测的搜索中未发现符合条件的文章。
Conclusions
There has been a notable increase in studies evaluating safety outcomes , with the majority of these being observational studies focusing primarily on malignancy , thromboembolic , and cardiovascular events , with most studies pertaining to JAKi safety .
近年来,评估安全结果的研究显著增加,其中大多数为观察性研究,主要关注恶性肿瘤、血栓栓塞和心血管事件,大多数研究涉及JAKi的安全性。
A substantial proportion of studies in this SLR relied on claims databases to evaluate safety outcomes , a practice that carries important methodological limitations for safety research .
这项系统综述中相当一部分研究依赖于索赔数据库来评估安全结果,这种做法对安全研究的方法学限制至关重要。
Surprisingly , not many studies looked into glucocorticoid safety outcomes over the past 3 years .
令人惊讶的是,在过去3年中,很少有研究关注糖皮质激素的安全性结果。
This SLR , along with the SLR on efficacy of DMARDs , informed the 2025 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of RA with synthetic and biological DMARDs .
这项系统评价综述(SLR),连同关于疾病修饰性抗风湿药物(DMARDs)疗效的SLR,为2025年欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)关于使用合成和生物制剂DMARDs管理类风湿关节炎(RA)的推荐更新提供了信息。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获