点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
background_and_aims
The aim was to evaluate and compare the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) vs . standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccination (SD-IIV) on respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes in persons with or without pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
该研究旨在评估并比较高剂量(HD-IIV)与标准剂量灭活流感疫苗(SD-IIV)在有或无既往动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者中对呼吸系统和心血管系统结局的相对疫苗有效性(rVE)。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
Methods
A prespecified exploratory analysis of a pragmatic , open-label , individually randomized trial conducted in Denmark during three influenza seasons .
这是在丹麦进行的一项实用、开放标签、个体随机试验的预先设定的探索性分析,该试验在三个流感季节进行。
Adults ≥65 years were randomized 1:1 to HD-IIV or SD-IIV .
成人≥65岁被随机分为1:1接受高剂量四价流感疫苗(HD-IIV)或标准剂量四价流感疫苗(SD-IIV)。
Baseline and outcome data were collected through nationwide registries .
通过全国登记处收集基线数据和结果数据。
The primary outcome was hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia .
主要结果是因流感或肺炎住院。
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death , hospitalization for myocardial infarction , or hospitalization for stroke .
主要不良心血管事件(MACE)被定义为心血管死亡、因心肌梗死住院或因中风住院的复合结果。
Heterogeneity in rVE among participants with vs . without ASCVD was assessed .
评估了有无动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)参与者中相对风险值(rVE)的异质性。
Results
The incidence of all outcomes was higher in participants with pre-existing ASCVD (n = 46 825) vs . those without (n = 285 613). rVE was consistent among participants with and without ASCVD (all Pinteraction ≥ .05).
所有结果的发生率在有既往ASCVD的参与者(n = 46,825)中比没有的参与者(n = 285,613)更高。有无ASCVD的参与者中rVE是一致的(所有P交互作用≥.05)。
The rVE for the primary outcome was 6.87% [95% confidence interval (CI), -2.52 to 15.42] among individuals without ASCVD and 4.71% (95% CI , -11.58 to 18.63) in those with (Pinteraction = .80).
在没有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的个体中,主要结果的相对疫苗效果(rVE)为6.87%(95%置信区间[CI],-2.52至15.42),而在有ASCVD的个体中为4.71%(95% CI,-11.58至18.63)(P交互作用= .80)。
For influenza hospitalizations , the rVE was 42.88% (95% CI , 22.07-58.44) vs . 45.73% (95% CI , 16.68-65.16) in those without vs . with ASCVD (Pinteraction = .84).
对于流感住院,没有ASCVD的个体的相对疫苗效果(rVE)为42.88%(95% CI,22.07-58.44),而在有ASCVD的个体中为45.73%(95% CI,16.68-65.16)(P交互作用= .84)。
For MACE , the rVE was 4.29% (95% CI , -6.50 to 14.00) in participants without , and 0.30% (95% CI , -17.56 to 15.44) in participants with , pre-existing ASCVD (Pinteraction = .68).
对于主要不良心血管事件(MACE),在没有既往动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的参与者中,相对风险效应(rVE)为4.29%(95%置信区间,-6.50至14.00),而在有既往ASCVD的参与者中,rVE为0.30%(95%置信区间,-17.56至15.44)(P交互作用 = .68)。
Conclusions
Among individuals ≥65 years , the rVE of HD-IIV vs . SD-IIV against respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes was similar among those with vs . without pre-existing ASCVD .
在≥65岁的个体中,高剂量灭活流感疫苗(HD-IIV)与标准剂量灭活流感疫苗(SD-IIV)相比,对于呼吸系统和心血管结果的相对风险效应(rVE)在有既往ASCVD的个体与没有既往ASCVD的个体之间是相似的。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获