点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
Background
To assess the effects of lifestyle interventions on gestational diabetes , determine whether the effects vary by maternal body mass index , age , parity , ethnicity , education level , or intervention , and rank interventions by effectiveness .
评估生活方式干预对妊娠糖尿病的影响,确定这些影响是否因母亲的体重指数、年龄、生育次数、种族、教育水平或干预措施的不同而有所差异,并按效果对干预措施进行排序。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
Methods
Individual participant data (IPD) and network meta-analysis .
个体参与者数据(IPD)和网络荟萃分析。
data_sources
Major electronic databases (January 1990 to April 2025).
主要电子数据库(1990年1月至2025年4月)。
Methods
This meta-analysis included randomised trials on the effects of lifestyle interventions (physical activity based , diet based , or mixed ) in pregnancy on gestational diabetes .
这项荟萃分析包括了关于生活方式干预(基于体力活动、基于饮食或混合型)对孕期妊娠糖尿病影响的随机试验。
Main outcomes were gestational diabetes defined by any criteria and by UK NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence ) criteria ; other outcomes included IADPSG (International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group ) and modified IADPSG defined gestational diabetes .
主要结果是根据任何标准和英国NICE(国家卫生与护理卓越研究所)标准定义的妊娠糖尿病;其他结果包括IADPSG(国际妊娠糖尿病研究组)和修改后的IADPSG定义的妊娠糖尿病。
A two stage IPD meta-analysis estimated summary odds ratios and 95% confidence interval s and interactions (subgroup effects ), along with absolute risk reduction estimates .
两阶段的个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析估计了汇总的比值比和95%置信区间以及交互作用(亚组效应),以及绝对风险降低的估计值。
Aggregate data from non-IPD trials were added to the meta-analysis when possible .
在可能的情况下,将非个体患者数据(IPD)试验的汇总数据添加到荟萃分析中。
Intervention effects were ranked using network meta-analysis .
使用网络荟萃分析对干预效果进行排名。
Results
104 randomised trials (35 993 women ) were included , with IPD for 68% of participants (24 391 women ; 54 studies ).
纳入了104项随机试验(共35,993名女性),其中68%的参与者(24,391名女性;54项研究)有IPD数据。
Lifestyle interventions reduced gestational diabetes defined by any criteria by 10% in IPD trials (odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.02; absolute risk reduction 1.3%, 95% CI -0.3% to 2.6%), and by 20% when combining IPD and non-IPD trials (odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.88; absolute risk reduction 2.6%, 95% CI 1.6% to 3.6%), and no reduction was observed using NICE criteria (odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.84to 1.13).
生活方式干预措施在IPD试验中将妊娠期糖尿病的发病率降低了10%(比值比0.90,95%置信区间(CI)0.80至1.02;绝对风险降低1.3%,95% CI -0.3%至2.6%),并且在结合IPD和非IPD试验时降低了20%(比值比0.80,95% CI 0.73至0.88;绝对风险降低2.6%,95% CI 1.6%至3.6%),而使用NICE标准时未观察到降低(比值比0.98,95% CI 0.84至1.13)。
Lifestyle interventions reduced gestational diabetes defined using IADPSG criteria by 14% in IPD trials (odds ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97; absolute risk reduction 2.7%, 95% CI 0.6% to 5.0%) and by 18% when combining IPD and non-IPD trials (odds ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93; absolute risk reduction 3.5%, 95% CI 1.3% to 5.7%).
生活方式干预措施在使用IADPSG标准定义的妊娠糖尿病中,IPD试验降低了14%(比值比0.86,95%置信区间0.75至0.97;绝对风险降低2.7%,95%置信区间0.6%至5.0%),当结合IPD和非IPD试验时降低了18%(比值比0.82,95%置信区间0.72至0.93;绝对风险降低3.5%,95%置信区间1.3%至5.7%)。
Effects did not vary by maternal characteristics , except for education .
效果并未因母亲特征而异,除了教育水平。
Although women of all educational levels benefited from the intervention , the benefit was less in those with low education (low v middle interaction : odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90; low v high interaction : odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93).
尽管所有教育水平的女性都从干预中受益,但在受教育程度较低的女性中,受益较少(低对中等教育水平的交互作用:比值比为0.68,95%置信区间为0.51至0.90;低对高等教育水平的交互作用:比值比为0.71,95%置信区间为0.54至0.93)。
Benefits did not vary by intervention characteristics , except for greater effectiveness with group format (odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.97; absolute risk reduction 2.5%, 95% CI 0.4% to 4.3%) and newly trained facilitators (odds ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.96; absolute risk reduction 2.4%, 95% CI 0.5% to 4.2%).
除了团体形式(比值比为0.81,95%置信区间为0.68至0.97;绝对风险降低为2.5%,95%置信区间为0.4%至4.3%)和新培训的引导者(比值比为0.82,95%置信区间为0.69至0.96;绝对风险降低为2.4%,95%置信区间为0.5%至4.2%)的干预效果更佳外,干预效果并未因干预特征而异。
Physical activity based interventions ranked highest (mean rank 1.1, 95% CI 1 to 2) in preventing gestational diabetes .
基于身体活动的干预措施在预防妊娠糖尿病方面排名最高(平均排名1.1,95%置信区间1至2)。
Conclusions
Lifestyle interventions in pregnancy are likely to prevent gestational diabetes , with effects varying according to diagnostic criteria .
孕期生活方式干预措施可能会预防妊娠糖尿病,其效果会根据诊断标准的不同而有所变化。
Implementation strategies should address inequalities by maternal education , and consider group formats , provider training , and physical activity based interventions to prevent gestational diabetes .
实施策略应通过母亲教育解决不平等,并考虑团体形式、提供者培训和基于身体活动的干预措施,以预防妊娠糖尿病。
study_registration
PROSPERO CRD 42020212884.
PROSPERO CRD42020212884。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获