点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
Background
The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary stenting according to bleeding risk is not well established .
根据出血风险确定的冠状动脉支架植入后双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间尚未明确。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
We aimed to evaluate the optimal duration of DAPT after coronary stenting according to bleeding risk .
我们旨在根据出血风险评估冠状动脉支架植入后双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间。
Methods
In this open-label , multicentre , randomised clinical trial , patients aged 19 years and older who received percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent at 50 high-volume cardiology centres in South Korea were stratified into high bleeding risk (HBR) or non-HBR strata , according to Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk criteria .
在这项开放标签、多中心、随机临床试验中,年龄在19岁及以上的患者在韩国50个高容量心脏病中心接受了药物洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,根据学术研究联盟高出血风险标准被分为高出血风险(HBR)或非HBR组。
Patients in the HBR stratum were randomly assigned (1:1) to 1-month or 3-month DAPT , and those in the non-HBR stratum were randomly assigned (1:1) to 3-month or 12-month DAPT .
HBR组的患者被随机分配(1:1)接受1个月或3个月的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT),而非HBR组的患者被随机分配(1:1)接受3个月或12个月的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)。
The three coprimary endpoints were net adverse clinical events (all-cause death , myocardial infarction , stent thrombosis , stroke , or major bleeding ), major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (cardiovascular death , myocardial infarction , definite or probable stent thrombosis , or ischaemic stroke ), and any actionable non-surgical bleeding at 1 year after randomisation .
三个共同主要终点是净不良临床事件(全因死亡、心肌梗死、支架血栓形成、中风或重大出血)、主要不良心脏或脑血管事件(心血管死亡、心肌梗死、确定或可能的支架血栓形成或缺血性中风)以及随机化后1年内任何可采取行动的非手术性出血。
Primary endpoints were assessed in hierarchical order in the intention-to-treat population .
主要终点在意向治疗人群中按层次顺序进行评估。
This study is registered with cris.nih.go.kr, KCT 0005356, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 05631769, and is complete .
该研究已在cris.nih.go.kr上注册,编号为KCT0005356,在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT05631769,并已完成。
Results
From July 24, 2020, to Sept 25, 2023, 4897 patients were enrolled (1598 in the HBR stratum and 3299 in the non-HBR stratum ).
从2020年7月24日至2023年9月25日,共有4897名患者被纳入研究(高风险人群1598名,非高风险人群3299名)。
In the HBR stratum , 1-month compared with 3-month DAPT did not reach non-inferiority for net adverse clinical events (144 [18·4%] of 798 vs 110 [14·0%] of 800 patients ; hazard ratio [HR] 1·337 [95% CI 1·043-1·713]; p=0·82 for non-inferiority ).
在高血小板反应性(HBR)患者中,1个月与3个月的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在净不良临床事件方面未达到非劣效性(1个月组144例[18.4%],3个月组110例[14.0%];风险比[HR] 1.337,95%置信区间[CI] 1.043-1.713;非劣效性检验p=0.82)。
Major adverse cardiac or cerebral events occurred in 74 (9·8%) patients in the 1-month DAPT group and 44 (5·8%) in the 3-month group ; bleeding occurred in 105 (13·8%) patients in the 1-month group and 122 (15·8%) in the 3-month group .
主要不良心脏或脑血管事件在1个月DAPT组中发生在74名(9.8%)患者中,而在3个月组中发生在44名(5.8%)患者中;出血事件在1个月组中发生在105名(13.8%)患者中,而在3个月组中发生在122名(15.8%)患者中。
In the non-HBR stratum , 3-month was non-inferior to 12-month DAPT regarding net adverse clinical events (47 [2·9%] of 1649 vs 72 [4·4%] of 1650 patients ; HR 0·657 [0·455-0·949]; p<0·0001 for non-inferiority ) and major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (36 [2·2%] vs 37 [2·3%]; HR 0·984 [0·622-1·558]; p=0·0082 for non-inferiority ), and superior for bleeding (120 [7·4%] vs 190 [11·7%]; HR 0·631 [0·502-0·793]; p<0·0001).
在非高出血风险(non-HBR)人群中,3个月的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在净不良临床事件(47 [2·9%] vs 72 [4·4%];风险比HR 0·657 [0·455-0·949];p<0·0001 表明非劣效性)和主要不良心脏或脑血管事件(36 [2·2%] vs 37 [2·3%];HR 0·984 [0·622-1·558];p=0·0082 表明非劣效性)方面不劣于12个月的DAPT,并且在出血事件方面更优(120 [7·4%] vs 190 [11·7%];HR 0·631 [0·502-0·793];p<0·0001)。
interpretation
In east Asian patients with HBR , 1-month DAPT did not reach non-inferiority to 3-month DAPT for net adverse clinical events .
在具有高出血风险(HBR)的东亚患者中,1个月的DAPT在净不良临床事件方面未能达到与3个月DAPT的非劣效性。
In patients without HBR , 3-month DAPT was non-inferior to 12-month DAPT regarding net adverse clinical events and major adverse cardiac or cerebral events , and superior for bleeding .
在没有高出血风险(HBR)的患者中,3个月的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)在净不良临床事件和主要不良心脏或脑血管事件方面与12个月的DAPT相比非劣效,并且在出血方面更优。
funding
Medtronic and Abbott .
美敦力和雅培。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获