点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
Background
Immunotherapy targeting PD-L1 improves outcomes in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no progression after definitive , concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT).
针对PD-L1的免疫治疗改善了不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在完成根治性、同步放化疗(cCRT)后无进展的预后。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
Earlier administration of immunotherapy , simultaneously with cCRT , may improve outcomes further .
更早地与cCRT同时进行免疫治疗可能会进一步改善预后。
Methods
Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either durvalumab or placebo administered from the start of cCRT .
符合条件的患者按2:1的比例随机分配接受durvalumab或安慰剂治疗,从cCRT开始时给药。
Patients without progression after completing cCRT received consolidation durvalumab or placebo (per initial random assignment ) until progression .
在完成cCRT后没有进展的患者继续接受巩固治疗,使用durvalumab或安慰剂(根据最初的随机分配),直至疾病进展。
The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review .
主要终点是通过双盲独立中央审查的无进展生存期(PFS)
Key secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), the proportion of patients alive at 24 months (OS24), and safety .
关键次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、总生存期(OS)、24个月时存活的患者比例(OS24)以及安全性。
Results
In total , 328 patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n = 219) or placebo (n = 109).
共有328名患者被随机分配接受durvalumab治疗(n = 219)或安慰剂(n = 109)。
There was no statistically significant difference with durvalumab versus placebo in PFS ( hazard ratio [HR], 0.85 [95% CI , 0.65 to 1.12]; P = .247) or OS (HR, 1.03 [95% CI , 0.78 to 1.39]; P = .823); OS 24 was 58.4% versus 59.5%, respectively .
在无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存(OS)方面,durvalumab与安慰剂相比没有统计学显著差异(PFS的危险比[HR]为0.85 [95%置信区间,0.65至1.12];P = .247;OS的HR为1.03 [95%置信区间,0.78至1.39];P = .823);24个月的总生存率分别为58.4%和59.5%。
Confirmed ORR was 60.7% with durvalumab versus 60.6% with placebo (difference, 0.2% [95% CI , -15.2 to 16.3%]; P = .976).
确认的客观缓解率(ORR)为60.7%使用durvalumab治疗,与使用安慰剂的60.6%相比(差异,0.2% [95% 置信区间, -15.2 到 16.3%];P = .976)。
With durvalumab versus placebo , respectively , maximum grade 3 or 4 adverse event s (AEs) occurred in 53.4% versus 59.3% of patients , pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis (group term ) in 28.8% (grade ≥3: 4.6%) versus 28.7% (grade ≥3: 5.6%), AEs leading to discontinuation of durvalumab or placebo in 25.6% versus 12.0%, and fatal AEs in 13.7% versus 10.2%.
使用durvalumab与安慰剂相比,分别有53.4%和59.3%的患者出现了最大级别的3级或4级不良事件(AEs),其中肺炎或放射性肺炎(组术语)的发生率为28.8%(3级或以上:4.6%)与28.7%(3级或以上:5.6%),导致durvalumab或安慰剂停药的不良事件发生率为25.6%与12.0%,致命不良事件的发生率为13.7%与10.2%。
Conclusions
Among patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC , durvalumab administered from the start of cCRT failed to demonstrate additional benefit compared with cCRT plus placebo .
在不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌患者中,从cCRT开始时给予的durvalumab与cCRT加安慰剂相比,未能显示出额外的益处。
Consolidation durvalumab following definitive cCRT remains the standard of care in this setting .
在这一背景下,巩固性durvalumab治疗在完成根治性cCRT后仍然是标准治疗。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获