点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
Background
We conducted a randomized controlled trial (SURF-RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of surgery versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
我们进行了一项随机对照试验(SURF-RCT),以评估手术与射频消融(RFA)对于肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
Simultaneously , eligible patients who dissented from random assignment were enrolled in a nonrandomized prospective observational trial (SURF-Cohort).
同时,对于那些不同意随机分配的符合条件的患者,我们让他们参与了一项非随机的前瞻性观察性试验(SURF-Cohort)。
We aimed to report the final analyses of overall survival (OS) and updated recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the SURF-RCT and SURF-Cohort trials .
我们旨在报告SURF-RCT和SURF-Cohort试验的最终总生存(OS)和更新的无复发生存(RFS)分析结果。
Methods
The trials were conducted in 49 institutions in Japan .
这些试验在日本的49个机构进行。
Patients with a largest HCC diameter of ≤3 cm and ≤3 HCC nodules were eligible .
最大直径≤3厘米的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者和≤3个HCC结节的患者符合入选条件。
The co-primary end points were RFS and OS .
共同的主要终点是无复发生存(RFS)和总生存(OS)。
Results
During 2009-2015, 1,094 patients were registered .
在2009-2015年间,共有1,094名患者被登记注册。
After excluding ineligible patients , 302 and 753 patients were included in the SURF-RCT (surgery, n = 150; RFA , n = 152) and SURF-Cohort trial (surgery, n = 382; RFA , n = 371), respectively .
在排除不符合条件的患者后,分别有302名和753名患者被纳入SURF-RCT试验(手术组,n=150;射频消融组,n=152)和SURF队列试验(手术组,n=382;射频消融组,n=371)。
In the SURF-RCT trial , 90% of patients had solitary HCC , and approximately 65% had an HCC diameter of ≤2.0 cm .
在SURF-RCT试验中,90%的患者患有单发性肝细胞癌,大约65%的患者肝细胞癌直径≤2.0厘米。
Serious adverse effects occurred in 3.3% of the surgery group and none in the RFA group .
手术组中有3.3%的患者出现了严重不良反应,而射频消融(RFA)组中没有出现。
The 5-year OS was 74.6% in the surgery group and 70.4% in the RFA group ( hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; adjusted P = .84).
手术组的5年总生存率为74.6%,射频消融(RFA)组为70.4%(风险比[HR],0.96;调整后P = .84)。
The 5-year RFS was 42.9% in the surgery group and 42.7% in the RFA group (HR, 0.90; adjusted P = .84).
手术组的5年无复发生存率为42.9%,射频消融(RFA)组为42.7%(风险比[HR],0.90;调整后P = .84)。
In the surgery group , 86 patients had recurrences ; 14 (16.3%) underwent surgery , and 50 (58.1%) underwent RFA .
在手术组中,86名患者出现复发;其中14名(16.3%)接受了手术治疗,50名(58.1%)接受了射频消融(RFA)治疗。
In the RFA group , 95 patients had recurrences ; 8 (8.4%) underwent surgery , and 55 (57.9%) underwent RFA .
在射频消融(RFA)组中,95名患者出现复发;其中8名(8.4%)接受了手术治疗,55名(57.9%)接受了射频消融(RFA)治疗。
In the SURF-Cohort trial , baseline factors were imbalanced between groups .
在SURF队列试验中,各组之间的基线因素存在不平衡。
After adjusting with the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis , OS and RFS showed no significant difference (P = .77 and P = .08).
在使用逆概率治疗加权分析进行调整后,总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)未显示出显著差异(P = .77和P = .08)。
Conclusions
The SURF trial did not demonstrate that surgery was superior to RFA for small HCC .
SURF 试验未显示手术对于小肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效优于射频消融(RFA)。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获