点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
Background
The addition of 1 year of palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared with placebo in the PENELOPE-B trial . In this article we report the final survival results of the PENELOPE-B trial .
在PENELOPE-B试验中,与安慰剂相比,将帕博西利添加至内分泌治疗(ET)1年并未改善侵袭性疾病无复发生存(iDFS)。本文报告了PENELOPE-B试验的最终生存结果。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
patients_and_methods
The PENELOPE-B trial investigated whether adding 1 year of palbociclib to ET in hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) breast cancer (BC) patients with residual disease and high relapse risk (clinical and pathological stage + estrogen receptor status and histological grade score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+) after taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy would improve patient survival . Patients (n = 1250) were randomly assigned to receive either palbociclib 125 mg or placebo d1-21 q4w for 13 cycles in addition to ET .
PENELOPE-B试验研究了在激素受体阳性(HR阳性)、人类表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2阴性)乳腺癌(BC)患者中,对于接受基于紫杉醇的新辅助化疗后仍有残留疾病和高复发风险(临床和病理分期+雌激素受体状态和组织学分级评分≥3或2和ypN+)的患者,添加1年帕博西利至内分泌治疗(ET)是否能改善患者的生存率。患者(n = 1250)被随机分配接受帕博西利125 mg或安慰剂d1-21 q4w,共13个周期,另外接受ET治疗。
Results
After a median follow-up of 77.8 months , we recorded 225 deaths (108 palbociclib ; 117 placebo ) with a 6-year overall survival (OS) rate of 82.4% in the palbociclib arm versus 80.3% in the placebo arm ( hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.14, P = 0.31).
经过中位随访77.8个月,我们记录了225例死亡(108例帕博西利;117例安慰剂),帕博西利组的6年总生存(OS)率为82.4%,而安慰剂组为80.3%(风险比0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.67-1.14,P = 0.31)。
No significant improvement was noted for palbociclib versus placebo for iDFS , distant disease-free survival or locoregional relapse rate , even with longer follow-up .
即使随访时间更长,帕博西利与安慰剂相比,无进展生存期(iDFS)、远处无病生存期或局部区域复发率也未见显著改善。
Upon stratified analysis , we found no benefits across major subgroups .
在分层分析中,我们发现主要亚组中没有明显益处。
However , exploratory post hoc analyses of the lobular BC (LBC) subgroup indicated a trend toward better survival outcomes in favor of palbociclib ( hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-1.07, P = 0.062 for OS and hazard ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.97, P = 0.035 for iDFS ).
然而,对浸润性小叶癌(LBC)亚组进行的探索性事后分析显示,与帕博西利相比,生存结果有向好的趋势(总生存的危险比为0.45,95%置信区间为0.19-1.07,P = 0.062;无病生存期的危险比为0.52,95%置信区间为0.28-0.97,P = 0.035)。
Conclusions
The study concluded that palbociclib did not significantly improve survival outcomes in the overall population .
研究得出结论,帕博西利并未显著改善整体人群的生存结果。
Exploratory post hoc analyses suggested a trend toward better iDFS outcome in patients with LBC receiving palbociclib .
探索性的事后分析表明,在接受帕博西利治疗的局部晚期乳腺癌患者中,无侵袭性疾病生存(iDFS)结果有向好的趋势。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获