点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
Introduction
Earlier results from the phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 1 trial indicated significant survival benefits and a generally acceptable safety profile of first-line cemiplimab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in 50% or more tumor cells and no EGFR , ALK , or ROS 1 aberrations .
早期EMPOWER-Lung 1期3阶段试验结果表明,对于表达程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)的50%或更多肿瘤细胞的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,与化疗相比,一线cemiplimab单药治疗具有显著的生存益处和总体可接受的安全性,且无EGFR、ALK或ROS1异常。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
Here , we report the five-year outcomes .
在这里,我们报告了五年的结果。
Methods
Patients were randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every three weeks for two years or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy .
患者按1:1比例随机接受cemiplimab 350 mg静脉注射,每三周一次,持续两年,或选择研究者指定的化疗方案。
The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival .
主要终点是总生存(OS)和无进展生存期。
Results
A total of 712 patients were randomized to cemiplimab (n = 357) or chemotherapy (n = 355).
共有712名患者被随机分配接受cemiplimab治疗(n=357)或化疗(n=355)。
The median duration of follow-up was 59.6 months (interquartile range : 55.1-66.7 months ) at the data cutoff (January 16, 2024).
在数据截止日期(2024年1月16日),随访的中位持续时间为59.6个月(四分位数范围:55.1-66.7个月)。
In patients with verified 50% or higher PD-L1 (n = 565), median OS was 26.1 months for cemiplimab versus 13.3 months for chemotherapy ( hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.72); the median progression-free survival was 8.1 months versus 5.3 months ( hazard ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval : 0.41-0.61); and the objective response rate was 46.5% versus 20.6%.
在PD-L1表达≥50%的患者(n = 565)中,cemiplimab的中位总生存期为26.1个月,化疗为13.3个月(风险比=0.59,95%置信区间[CI]: 0.48-0.72);无进展生存期的中位数为8.1个月对比5.3个月(风险比=0.50,95%置信区间: 0.41-0.61);客观缓解率为46.5%对比20.6%。
The five-year OS probability was 29.0% for cemiplimab and 15.0% for chemotherapy .
cemiplimab的五年总生存概率为29.0%,化疗为15.0%。
Improved survival outcomes were observed with both squamous and nonsquamous histology , and increasing activity of cemiplimab was correlated with higher PD-L1 expression , with the highest PD-L1 expression having the best outcome .
观察到鳞状和非鳞状组织学类型的患者生存结果均有所改善,cemiplimab的活性增加与PD-L1表达水平升高相关,PD-L1表达最高的患者预后最佳。
The safety profile remains consistent with previous results .
安全性特征与以往结果保持一致。
Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event s occurred in 18.3% of patients for cemiplimab and 39.9% for chemotherapy .
cemiplimab治疗相关的3级或更高级别的不良事件发生在18.3%的患者中,化疗组为39.9%。
Conclusions
At five-year follow-up , first-line cemiplimab monotherapy continued to show durable clinical benefits versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with 50% or higher PD-L1 .
在五年随访中,对于PD-L1表达水平为50%或更高的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,cemiplimab单药一线治疗与化疗相比,继续显示出持久的临床益处。
Patients with 90% or higher PD-L1 derived the largest clinical benefits .
具有90%或更高PD-L1表达的患者获得了最大的临床益处。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获