点击单词查义 · 长按句子看翻译 · 登录后可朗读
Background
To evaluate whether the addition of a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose ) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib to maintenance immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab after frontline chemoimmunotherapy improved outcomes in patients with Schlafen 11 (SLFN11)-positive extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).
评估在一线化疗免疫治疗后,添加聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶抑制剂talazoparib到维持免疫检查点抑制剂atezolizumab中,是否能改善表达Schlafen 11(SLFN11)的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的预后。
AI 讲解 快速 深入 整句 标记
Methods
Patients with newly diagnosed SLFN 11 expressing (H-score ≥ 1, evaluated centrally ) ES-SCLC were randomized to maintenance atezolizumab (A) versus atezolizumab plus talazoparib (AT) after frontline chemotherapy plus atezolizumab .
新诊断的表达SLFN11(H评分≥1,经中心评估)的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者被随机分配到维持atezolizumab(A)与atezolizumab加talazoparib(AT)治疗组,在一线化疗加atezolizumab后。
The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) using a one-sided 10% level stratified log-rank test .
主要目标是比较无进展生存期(PFS),使用单侧10%水平的分层对数秩检验。
Secondary endpoints included objective response rate , overall survival , and toxicity .
次要终点包括客观缓解率、总生存期和毒性。
The target sample size was 84 eligible patients .
目标样本量为84名符合条件的患者。
Results
From June 15, 2020, to December 15, 2022, 106 eligible patients were randomized (54 to AT and 52 to A ).
从2020年6月15日至2022年12月15日,共有106名符合条件的患者被随机分配(54名至AT组,52名至A组)。
Progression-free survival was improved with AT versus A ( hazard ratio = 0.66, 80% confidence interval : 0.50-0.86, one-sided p = 0.019) with a median PFS of 2.9 and 2.4 months ; overall survival was not different between groups ( hazard ratio = 0.98, 80% confidence interval : 0.71-1.36, one-sided p = 0.47).
无进展生存期在AT组与A组相比有所改善(风险比=0.66,80%置信区间:0.50-0.86,单侧p=0.019),中位无进展生存期分别为2.9个月和2.4个月;两组之间的总生存期没有差异(风险比=0.98,80%置信区间:0.71-1.36,单侧p=0.47)。
Grade 3 and higher non-hematologic treatment-related adverse event s occurred in 17% of patients with AT and 14% of patients with A .
在AT组和A组中,分别有17%和14%的患者出现了3级及以上的非血液学治疗相关不良事件。
Grade 3 and higher hematological treatment-related adverse event s were more common in AT (50%) than in A (4%) (p < 0.001).
在AT治疗组中,3级及以上的血液学治疗相关不良事件的发生率(50%)高于A治疗组(4%)(p < 0.001)。
Conclusions
Maintenance AT improved PFS in patients with SLFN11-positive ES-SCLC that did not progress after initial chemo-immunotherapy .
对于初始化疗免疫治疗后未进展的SLFN11阳性广泛期小细胞肺癌患者,维持AT治疗可改善无进展生存期(PFS)。
Hematologic toxicity , primarily grade 3 anemia , was increased with AT , as expected .
如预期,与AT治疗相关的血液毒性增加,主要是3级贫血。
Prospective biomarker selection was demonstrated , paving the way for future evaluation of novel therapies in molecularly defined SCLC populations .
展示了前瞻性生物标志物选择,为未来在分子定义的小细胞肺癌人群中评估新疗法铺平了道路。
本文献翻译由 AI 辅助生成,仅供文献精读与英语学习参考。临床决策请以 PubMed / PMC 原文为准。
完成本篇 · 查看今日收获